Preparing Your Outdoor Business For Sustainability Compliance in 2026

For the outdoor industry, sustainable business practices have moved from nice-to-have initiatives to strict legal requirements. Brands are navigating an increasingly complex system of laws across the United States, Canada, and the European Union (EU) that cover everything from greenhouse gas emissions reporting to green marketing claims.   

This blog post aims to provide a broad overview of sustainability compliance obligations for the outdoor industry, along with actions for meeting those requirements. But before we get into it, we need to start with a short disclaimer. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Readers should consult with qualified legal counsel to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. 

Climate Accountability: Confusion in California 

California is the only state in the U.S. that has enacted climate disclosure laws. The laws mandate companies with over $500M in annual revenue to disclose their climate-related financial risk (SB 261) and mandate companies with over $1B in annual revenue to disclose their scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions (SB 253). Lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of these laws have upended the enforcement timeline. Here’s the latest:  

  • Climate-related risk reporting (SB 261): Under the original regulatory timeline, covered entities were supposed to submit their climate-related risk reports on January 1, 2026. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted an injunction pending appeal for SB 261, effectively pausing the enforcement of the law. Oral arguments were heard in January. Until the Ninth Circuit releases a decision following those arguments, reporting for this law is paused.  
  • Greenhouse gas emissions disclosure (SB 253): The Ninth Circuit did not grant an injunction pending appeal for SB 253. Enforcement of this law is still proceeding as scheduled, which means that covered entities should be preparing to report their scope 1 and 2 emissions in August of this year, and prepare to report their scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions in 2027. This schedule is subject to change, pending the ongoing lawsuit challenging SB 253, in addition to SB 261.  

Chemistry: PFAS Regulations Expand in Scope Across the U.S. 

Chemistry is the backbone of performance gear, providing the waterproofing and durability outdoor enthusiasts expect. However, concerns about the harm of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have led to a wave of bans and reporting requirements, including: 

  • Bans on products with intentionally added PFAS: Several states have already enacted bans on the sale of textiles and apparel containing intentionally added PFAS. 
  • Mandatory disclosure labels: Many jurisdictions require a visible label stating that products contain PFAS when on sale in retailers and online.  
  • Reporting requirements: Many states require companies to report products that have intentionally added PFAS. The U.S. government also has a one-time backward looking reporting requirement under TSCA, however, there are proposed changes to this requirement that would significantly reduce and/or eliminate reporting requirements for most outdoor companies.  

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Shifting Responsibility of Products’ End-of-Life  

Governments are increasingly holding producers responsible for the waste their products and packaging create, and are turning to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) programs. EPR assigns producers financial or operational responsibility for the collection and recycling of their goods, which often entails: 

  • Stewardship organization enrollment: Producers can be required to join a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) and pay fees based on the volume and material type of their packaging.   
  • Textile recovery registration: California became the first state in the U.S. to enact a textile EPR program. Brands doing business in California will soon be required to register with a PRO and pay fees to fund the repair, sorting, and recycling infrastructure for apparel and textile articles.   
  • Eco-modulated fees: Many EPR programs are implementing “eco-modulation,” meaning fees are adjusted based on the product’s sustainable attributes.  

Green Claims: Eliminating “Greenwashing” 

Vague claims like “sustainable” or “eco-friendly” are facing global unprecedented scrutiny. Multiple U.S. states and other countries have introduced guidelines to ensure environmental marketing messaging is accurate. While laws differ, outdoor companies generally need to:   

  • Substantiate all sustainability claims: Under current federal guidelines, brands must be able to prove any environmental claim they make with reliable evidence. 
  • Adhere to state-level laws: While every state has laws prohibiting deceptive conduct, many have made “greenwashing” (the act of making false or misleading claims about the environmental benefits of a product) a violation of consumer protection laws. 
  • Disclose carbon offset processes: California now requires companies that use “net zero,” “carbon neutral,” or similar terminology to disclose on their website how those claims are achieved (CA AB 1305). 

Ensure Your Outdoor Brand is Compliant in 2026 

As new laws take effect, OIA is here to help outdoor companies implement sustainable business practices and remain compliant. We recently released an updated version of our “Guide to Comply” exclusively for OIA members. This 20+ page resource covers the specific regulations impacting the outdoor industry in 2026. 

In addition to this guide, our Support Plus and Leadership members get access to our Sustainability Policy and Reporting Task Forces. These groups provide time-sensitive alerts as new legislation emerges and a place to discuss compliance challenges with peers.  

If you’re ready to learn more about the benefits of becoming an OIA member, get in touch with us.  

References: 

https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/california-corporate-greenhouse-gas-ghg-reporting-and-climate-related-financial 

https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/california-climate-disclosure-laws-ninth-circuit-hears-oral-argument-no-ruling-yet 

https://calrecycle.ca.gov/epr/textiles/ 

https://www.persefoni.com/blog/ab-1305 

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB1305

The Hidden Challenge of Circularity: Managing Chemical Risks in Recycled Materials

recycled-materials-challenges

Recycling is a cornerstone of the circular economy, aiming to reuse products and regenerate materials to reduce environmental impacts like greenhouse gas emissions. However, as outdoor companies expand their commitments to using recycled content, a significant challenge has emerged: chemical safety. 

Today’s recycling systems are not fully equipped to guarantee that recycled feedstocks are free from hazardous substances. Without strong safeguards, brands and manufacturers risk unintentionally recirculating “legacy” chemicals into their products or even introducing new contaminants caused by the recycling process itself.  

Understanding the Infrastructure Gap 

Recycling capabilities vary wildly across plastics, textiles, paper, and metals. Most current systems are optimized for clean, single-material streams, but real-world waste is often highly mixed and chemically complex. 

In general, there are two common recycling processes that each pose different chemical risks: 

  • Mechanical Recycling: Dominates the market but tends to recirculate rather than remove chemicals, leaving new products vulnerable to contamination. 
  • Molecular (Chemical) Recycling: Can remove unwanted substances, but requires more energy and may result in chemicals of concern released into the environment surrounding the recycling facility.  

Critical Risk Areas for the Outdoor Industry 

For our industry, textiles represent the most critical risk area. Currently, less than 1% of collected textiles are recycled back into new fibers, but those that are often come from sources with unknown chemical histories. 

Factors like limited ingredient transparency and multi-material construction increase the likelihood that restricted substances, such as PFAS, phthalates, heavy metals, and flame retardants, make it into the final product. These risks extend to other materials as well: 

  • Plastics: Often contain non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) and residual chemicals. 
  • Metals: Can inadvertently introduce toxic heavy metals if waste streams are poorly characterized. 
  • Paper: Requires careful management to avoid contaminants found in original coatings and inks. 

A Path Toward Non-Toxic Circularity 

There is currently no comprehensive, affordable testing protocol that can reliably identify every contaminant in every batch of recycled feedstock. And while certifications help manage risk, they do not completely eliminate it. Rather, success depends on rigorous implementation and total supply-chain transparency. 

To move forward, outdoor companies must adopt a systems-level approach to chemical risk. This includes: 

  • Evaluating the origin of feedstocks and sorting processes. 

  • Assessing contamination risks specific to material types. 

  • Collaborating across industry, academia, and policy to develop safer chemistries and better traceability. 

Learn About Chemical Safety with OIA’s New Guidebook 

The Outdoor Industry Association (OIA) has developed a comprehensive “Chemical Risks of Recycled Materials Guidebook” to equip outdoor companies with the tools and insights needed to safely source recycled materials. It outlines risks by material category, compares recycling technologies, and provides a practical framework for evaluating suppliers and assessing contamination risk based on four key categories: 

  • Original material use, application, and industry.
  • Collection, sorting, and other pre-processing methods.
  • Recycling methods and quality control specifications.
  • End-use application. 

The guidebook is currently available in the OIA Mobilize platform. Not an OIA Support Plus or Leadership member but want to learn more? Get in touch today. 

A Smarter Path to Cleaner, Safer Products: OIA’s Six-Step Roadmap for Chemicals Management

The outdoor industry thrives on innovation, performance, and a commitment to sustainability. Yet, as awareness of the environmental impact of business grows, companies are facing increasing pressure to align their products and supply chains with sustainable practices that prioritize safety and transparency. 

Chemicals used in outdoor recreation products—from waterproof coatings to durable textiles —play a critical role in performance. However, many traditional formulations contain substances that pose risks to human health and ecosystems. Governments worldwide are implementing stricter regulations, and consumers are demanding greater accountability from brands. 

Recognizing this shifting landscape, the Outdoor Industry Association (OIA), through its Clean Chemistry and Materials Coalition (CCMC), is equipping outdoor businesses like yours with the tools and strategies you need to take proactive steps toward safer, cleaner product development. 

New OIA Resources: A Roadmap for Safer Products 

To help organizations navigate chemical safety, compliance, and innovation, OIA is releasing two new resources to guide planning and implementation to reach sustainability goals.  

  • CCMC Guidebook – A comprehensive, 73-page resource for Support+ and Leadership members, featuring detailed checklists, case studies, and technical guidance on building a robust chemicals management program. 

Both guides center around OIA’s six-step CCMC Pathway, which provides you with a structured approach to eliminating harmful chemicals, adopting safer alternatives, and integrating supply chain sustainability into long-term strategies. 

Let’s explore these six steps and how your company can leverage them to build a safer, more sustainable business. 

1. Discover: Map Your Chemistry Footprint

Before businesses can improve chemical safety, they need to understand their starting point. The first step in chemicals management is gaining visibility into your supply chain, materials, and potential chemical hazards. 

Key actions: 

  • Map your supplier network – Understand where and how your products are made, including Tier 1 and upstream suppliers. 
  • Build a material inventory – Track what’s in your products, from base materials to performance treatments. 
  • Identify high-risk chemicals – Review industry-standard Restricted Substances Lists (RSLs) and emerging regulations, such as PFAS bans. 
  • Monitor evolving regulations – Stay ahead of national and international compliance requirements to avoid risks like product recalls. 

Why this matters: Businesses that take a proactive approach to understanding their chemical footprint will reduce regulatory risks and build consumer trust. 

2. Plan: Set Goals and Build a Strategy

Once a company understands its chemical risks, the next step is to set clear objectives and create an action plan for safer chemistry. 

Key actions: 

  • Define internal and external goals – Set measurable targets for eliminating harmful chemicals and adopting safer alternatives. 
  • Assign responsible teams – Ensure cross-functional collaboration across product development, compliance, and sourcing teams. 
  • Develop a phased action plan – Outline short-term compliance goals and long-term innovation strategies. 
  • Ensure supplier accountability – Work with manufacturers to implement clear, enforceable chemical policies. 

Why this matters: A strategic plan keeps businesses on track, ensuring chemicals management efforts align with business sustainability goals. 

3. Act: Implement Safer Practices

With a plan in place, companies must now take action to integrate safer chemistry into product development and supply chain management. 

Key actions: 

  • Adopt a Restricted Substances List (RSL) – Align with industry standards to ensure compliance across product lines. 
  • Implement a robust testing program – Establish procedures for monitoring chemicals at various stages of production. 
  • Communicate expectations with suppliers – Clearly define what materials and formulations are acceptable. 
  • Phase out high-risk chemicals – Proactively replace harmful substances with verified safer alternatives. 

Why this matters: Companies that act now to implement safer chemicals management will be better positioned for future regulations and market demands. 

4. Accelerate: Strengthen Supplier Partnerships & Drive Innovation

Once the foundation of a chemicals management program is in place, the next step is to scale impact through continuous improvement and innovation. 

Key actions: 

  • Move beyond compliance – Establish Manufacturing Restricted Substances Lists (MRSLs) to control chemical inputs, not just finished products. 
  • Implement supplier chemicals management systems – Work directly with manufacturers to improve chemical safety practices. 
  • Explore green chemistry innovations – Invest in safer material alternatives that enhance product durability and performance. 
  • Leverage data-driven decision-making – Use testing insights and supplier audits to refine chemical safety strategies. 

Why this matters: Forward-thinking organizations go beyond compliance—they lead with innovation and corporate environmental responsibility. 

5. Advocate: Shape the Future of Safer Chemistry

The outdoor industry must work collaboratively to drive systemic change. Businesses that engage in policy advocacy and industry partnerships can help shape a greener future for outdoor products. 

Key actions: 

  • Support public policies that promote safer alternatives and sustainability in business. 
  • Engage with policymakers to influence chemical safety regulations. 
  • Collaborate with industry groups – Join coalitions like OIA’s CCMC to share best practices and research. 
  • Invest in sustainable chemistry startups to accelerate eco-friendly business solutions. 

Why this matters: Companies that take an active role in shaping the future of chemicals management will help set industry standards, rather than simply reacting to them.

6. Share: Build Trust Through Transparency

Consumers expect companies to be honest and transparent about their sustainability efforts. Clear communication about chemicals management builds credibility and loyalty. 

Key actions: 

  • Provide verifiable data – Back up environmental claims with testing results and certifications. 
  • Educate consumers – Help customers understand why safer chemistry matters and how it enhances product performance. 
  • Avoid misleading green claims – Ensure all sustainability messaging is accurate and compliant with greenwashing laws. 
  • Report progress publicly – Share chemicals management milestones in sustainability reports and marketing materials. 

Why this matters: Transparent organizations build stronger consumer relationships while staying ahead of corporate sustainability regulations. 

Taking the First Step Toward Safer, Smarter Products 

Adopting robust chemicals management practices is no longer optional — it’s a business imperative. Companies that fail to act risk regulatory penalties, supply chain disruptions, and consumer backlash. 

By following OIA’s six-step roadmap, your company can: 

  • Reduce regulatory risk and stay ahead of evolving laws. 
  • Enhance brand trust through credible sustainability efforts. 
  • Leverage sustainable innovation to create high-performance, low-impact products. 
  • Strengthen supplier relationships for a resilient, responsible supply chain. 

The Clean Chemistry and Materials Coalition (CCMC) is here to help. Whether you’re just getting started or refining an existing program, OIA’s new Chemicals Management Getting Started Guide and CCMC Guidebook provide the tools and resources you need. 

Learn more and access the resources at outdoorindustry.org. 

  

How Outdoor Brands Are Reducing Textile Emissions with Smarter Energy Solutions

Reducing emissions in textile production isn’t just an environmental responsibility—it’s a business necessity. Consumers expect brands to take meaningful action on sustainability, and regulations are pushing companies to reduce their carbon footprints. One of the biggest challenges? The fossil fuel-based heating systems used in textile manufacturing. 

Traditional heating methods rely on coal, gas, or oil, making them a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. The textile and apparel industry alone contributes about 2% of global emissions, and with demand increasing, that number will only grow. If your brand is committed to lowering emissions, tackling the energy sources used in textile mills is a critical step. 

A Practical Solution to Help You Reduce Emissions 

To support this transition, Outdoor Industry Association, in partnership with Global Efficiency Intelligence and OIA member brands like Cotopaxi, L.L. Bean, New Balance, Patagonia, REI Co-op, and W.L. Gore & Associates, have launched the Textile Heating Electrification Tool. This open-source resource helps mills and brands transition from fossil fuels to electric heating by providing data on energy use, cost savings, and emissions reduction. It supports sustainability goals, regulatory compliance, and long-term efficiency. 

Why This Matters for Your Brand 

Sustainability goals can’t be met without action at the manufacturing level. The heating systems used in textile mills account for a significant share of supply chain emissions, and electrification is one of the most effective ways to lower them. 

This tool provides clear, actionable insights to help businesses: 

  • Understand their current heating systems and identify where fossil fuel use can be reduced. 
  • Evaluate electric alternatives that work for different textile processes. 
  • Make informed investment decisions with data on costs, feasibility, and emissions reductions.

Andrew Dempsey, Director of Climate at REI Co-op, explained the importance of this issue: 

“At REI, we believe progress on climate solutions happens through collaboration. Our goal is to cut emissions in half by 2030, but we can’t get there without working closely with our brand and manufacturing partners. Electric heat technologies are essential for decarbonizing textile manufacturing, and this tool gives us the data we need to move forward with confidence.” 

Collaboration Makes Sustainability More Achievable 

Developed under OIA’s Clean Heat CoLab, this tool embodies a collaborative approach to tackling industry challenges. OIA Impact CoLabs help brands and suppliers work closely, advancing sustainability goals more efficiently while lowering costs. 

Julie Brown, Director of Sustainable Business Innovation at Outdoor Industry Association, highlighted the significance of this initiative: 

“The launch of the Textile Heating Electrification Tool marks a major step in our industry’s collective effort to cut emissions in textile manufacturing. This tool combines expertise from across the outdoor industry to provide mills with the insights they need to transition to cleaner, more sustainable heating technologies.” 

How to Get Started 

This tool is designed to help businesses like yours take meaningful steps toward emissions reductions. If your brand works with textile suppliers, this is a resource that can drive real change. 

Watch the webinar recording below and download our one-pager to start using this tool for smarter decision-making in your business. 

Want to go further? Contact sustainability@outdoorindustry.org to get involved in OIA’s sustainability programs and work toward a lower-carbon future.